Showing posts with label mill rate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mill rate. Show all posts

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Not Looking Pretty

If you caught the State Journal yesterday, you really couldn't miss the front page, full cover graphic showing the 2012 Madison assessment picture.  Everyone believed that last year would be our last  negative blip on the equalized valuation.  Things had to tick upward...right?

The Sun Prairie school district even "conservatively" used a figure of 0% change in the equalized valuation that may not have anything to do with the district tax levy, yet has EVERYTHING to do with effective (district-wide) mill rate.

Remember folks, that if spending remains the same as last year, and equalized valuation of district property also remains the same (0% growth), then the mill rate remains what it was last year.  If spending remains the same and valuation drops 3 %, then the effective mill rate GOES UP 3%.

So let us take one little happy dream away from you. Do not think for one second that school district expenses will either drop or stay the same.  They WILL spend more folks.  District Administration was even nice enough to set aside 2% of this year's salary expenditures for raises next year!

Now...most of us (and the district too) are hoping that new construction such as the Woodman's will help push the equalized valuation of all real property above 0%.  We can't say for sure that won't happen, but a big piece of the puzzle is in:  Madison assessments.  And it sure looks like the area of Madison which falls within the Sun Prairie School district (a significant chunk thereof) looks to be DOWN at least 4% and as much as -5.9%.

Ruh Roh, Raggy.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Final 2011-12 Tax Levies & Mill Rates

Wow....talk about standing out in a crowd!
The SPASD Administration wants SPASD to stand out, and it sure does now.
We're the leaders!  Well...in millrate anyway.

If we look at SPASD vs. the 20 similar sized school districts (10 larger and 10 smaller in enrollments), Sun Prairie is head and shoulders above the rest in mill rate ($12.62) and has the 4th highest tax levy!

While our rival, Middleton-Cross Plains bests out slightly in terms of tax levy, we cream them in mill rate.
A $200,000 home in Sun Prairie will pay $482 MORE in taxes this year than a similar value home in MCPSD.

Statewide, the average mill rate is $9.84 per $1000---SPASD's mill rate is 28.3% higher.
We rank in the top 15% of all districts in terms of tax levy increase over last year.  In fact, the statewide average was a 1.45% DROP in mill rate.  How "wonderful" does Sun Prairie's 3.5% INCREASE look now?
269 (out of 424) school districts set a tax levy either the same or lower than last year.  211 districts have a mill rate the same or lower than last year, while Sun Prairies mill rate is rising 4.1%.

Oh...and while we're at it....lest anyone overlook it, our tax levy ($10.9M) SOLELY for referendum-related debt is now second only to Kenosha.  Yikes!

We'll be here all week....enjoy your tax bills!  Be sure to tip your waitresses and thank the school board members who approved all this.


Sunday, August 21, 2011

Board Budget "Work-Study" Session This Week

See the agenda


Aug 25, 2011 - SPECIAL SCHOOL BOARD WORK STUDY MEETING,
7:00 p.m. at the District Office (Room 100), 501 S. Bird St., Sun Prairie.


Subject: 
Discussion and possible action on the 2011-2012 budget

Can community residents attend? Yes; it is an open public meeting. 


Can community residents speak? That's entirely up to board president John Whalen. He CAN allow people to speak, but does not typically do so.


What will they talk about? They may start off with the same old 30-40 minute slideshow. Hopefully not. Hopefully they'll come out of the gate with their pencils sharpened and in a pork trimming mode. Because there is pork in that thar budget!

Will they make any formal decisions? Possibly, but don't get your hopes up. Historically, these work-study sessions haven't produced any real "motions". It's usually just talk. But at least you can see where things are headed. 

What does the budget picture look like at present? Glad you asked.  By our tally... --->

 Why won't they ever give us real numbers. All they ever say is that the tax levy increase will be a certain percentage. What's the dollar amount?
We've included those figure in the graphic at right.

SP-EYE's motion:  Update budget parameters to include Budget Initiatives 1 and 2 without adding new FTEs.  Tax levy goal of 2.0%; tax levy increase not to exceed 2.5%.

Saturday, August 20, 2011

Some Good News! Equalized Values Not as Low as Predicted.

The Department of Revenue issued it's preliminary Equalized Valuation reports this week.  While the cities of Sun prairie and Madison valuations were down -0.79% and -1.11% respectively, other communities (Town of Bristol, Town of Sun Prairie) in the district saw their valuations rise.  While we won't know for sure until tax time, our estimate now looks to be a district-wide Equalized Value reduction of just -0.5%.  That's a good sight better than early estimates which suggested the numbers might be as low as - 2 to -2.5%.

An equalized valuation decrease of 0.5% (where the district had been basing its estimates on 0.0%) would mean that the projected district-wide mill rate will rise another 0.5%.

Statewide, property values feel for the third consecutive year, dropping 1.8 percent, or $5.7 billion.
---http://www.channel3000.com/houseandhome/28871405/detail.htm

Dane County property values dropped 0.92%
---http://www.revenue.wi.gov/equ/county.html
CLICK for link to DOR map


Sunday, July 17, 2011

So...What's the Mill Rate Looking Like?

We could be looking at as much as a $180 increase in taxes on a home assessed at $200K if the school board approves additional $600,000 in spending and equalized values drop 2.5% (as anticipated).  That could set the mill rate at it's highest point over the last 15 years!

What recession!

Scenario                                                 Mill        Cost / $200K  Increase
The current picture with no additional spending and Equalized Value stays flat
Levy up 3.50%    Eq Value up 0.0%     $12.55     $2,510             $ 86


The picture with with no additional spending and Equalized Value drops 2.5%
Levy up 3.50%    Eq Value up -2.5%    $12.87     $2,574            $150


The picture with $600K additional spending and Equalized Value stays flat
Levy up 4.75%    Eq Value up 0.0%      $12.69     $2,538            $114


The picture with $600K additional spending and Equalized Value drops 2.5%
Levy up 4.75%    Eq Value up -2.5%    $13.02     $2,604             $180
Note: The mill rate has not topped $13.00 since the 1996-97 school year!


The picture with with only a 2% tax levy increase and the Equalized value stays flat 
Levy up 2.00%    Eq Value up 0.0%      $12.36     $2,472             $ 48

Monday July 18th Agenda: Attend Public Hearing on the Schools Budget



Note:  The district wants to spend more money and wants to exceed the school board's budget parameter of having the tax levy increase not exceed 3.5%.  Of course, they don't want to give anything up to accomplish this, they just want to raise property taxes.  


The Sun Prairie School Board Finance Committee will hold another Public Hearing on the proposed budget on Monday, July 18, at 7 pm at the School District Office (501 S. Bird St.).  We were pleased to see more than 40 community members at the June public hearing and hope even more will be able to attend on July 18th. Your input is very important to the budget process and the future of Sun Prairie's schools!
 
Recent developments since the last public hearing include:

1.  The State of Wisconsin released it's first state aid estimate for our school district.  Unfortunately, Sun Prairie's state aid is projected to decrease by 6.2%, which represents an additional $730,000 loss in aid than was discussed at the June public hearing.

2.  The total loss in state aid from 2010-2011 to this year will be over $2 million.  We had expected and planned for a loss in aid of $1,300,000, but did not expect to lose the additional $730,000.

3.  The School Board will be discussing options to address the loss of state aid.
 
More information is available on the district website.  Link is:  
http://www.sunprairie.k12.wi.us/budget_planning_2011_12.cfm#d159570

Saturday, June 18, 2011

What The District Would Rather You Not Know

The June 16, Budget Hearing was all about sleight of hand and basic mis-direction.  Don't answer the questions you don't want the public to know---instead keep repeating a mantra.  You know...kind of like politicians that don't answer questions during a debate, they just keep reciting what they want to tell you.

What's the projected tax levy?
What they want you to focus on is the % increase over last year...and that is 3.48%.
Yeah?...but what is the actual levy amount?
OK, since they won't, let's do the math for you.
It starts with last year's tax levy, which was $45,503,637.  Therefore, if the district's draft budget represents a 3.5% increase, then the plan is to levy $47,087,164  this year.

The increase in levy is this $1.6M, with $650K of that going to debt and $950K additional for the General Fund.

What the district isn't saying:
Either through savings or cuts made by the school board, the "budget" has been reduced by $725,000.  BUT...the district did not take this money out of the budget.  They took out or reduced line items, but they left  the required revenue in the budget.  It's a sweet little deal so that they can convince you and the board to fund the district's other initiatives.  You know what's actually more interesting?  They left $725,000 "unallocated" in the budget, yet if one sums up the total cost of all their desired initiatives, the total is only $600,000!!!  So...why didn't they reduce the budget by $125,000?  Hmmm?  $725K represents 17% more than they need to fund all the initiatives they want.  It's just more of the same...put more cash in the Munny Pot.  


Actually, if you remove the $725,000 from the budget, the tax levy increase is reduced from 3.48% (let's call it 3.5%, shall we?)  to a mere 1.9%  Now that's more reasonable, right?

What is the projected 2011-12 mill rate?
The district doesn't want to tell you!  Their mantra is, "Focus on the tax levy"...remember?

Mill rate is tax levy divided by Equalized Value x 1000.  The equalized value is projected to remain flat (more on that to come!).  Therefore, if the tax levy is increasing by 3.5%, then so is the mill rate.  Since the final mill rate for the district last year was $12.12, then a 3.5% increase would make it $12.54.

The TRUE mill rate (without the budget fluff).
First, once we remove that $725,000 from the budget, the tax levy is increasing by 1.9% and then so, therefore is the mill rate.  That would reduce the mill rate to $12.35.

What will be the tax on an average ($200K) home?
The district presentation indicates that a home valued at $200K will pay an additional $84.39.
OK...but what's the total tax?  Obviously the district would rather not highlight the total school tax.  But we'll do it for you.  At $12.54 mill rate, the total school tax on a $200K home will be $2,508.

What's the real tax?
Once we take out the $725K,  the tax paid on a $200K home is actually $2,470, an increase of only $46.11 over last year.

How valid is the district's projection of a 0% increase in the district-wide equalized value?
When asked, the district reluctantly indicated that current projections (which we will know by August 15th) is for equalized value to once again DROP this year by at least 2% and more likely 3%.

How does a 3% drop in Equalized Value the mill rate/property tax?
The district flat out does not want to discuss this, so we will.
Again, assuming that the $725,000 "unallocated" is removed, if the equalized value drops 3% district-wide, the mill rate jumps to $12.73, a 5.0% increase over last year.  Note that, with a 3% reduction in equalized value, the tax levy may only be increasing by 1.9%, but the mill rate will increase by 5.0%.

What initiatives is the district considering on which to spend an additional $725,000
We provide the following graphic summaries, one in terms of mill rate effect and the other based on tax effect.  Note that we believe that many of these initiatives are worth taking on.  We simply object to the underhanded manner in which the district went about it.  Culver gets all upset about sham residences and ulterior motives and then the district pulls this rabbit out of a hat.  The right thing is to prepare the budget without them and then show how each (and the total) would impact the budget.
  


Saturday, June 4, 2011

Early Warning for Equalized Valuations?


An article on Channel3000.com this week states that,
"Home prices have hit another new low, down to levels not reached since 2002."

How does that play into the magic "Equalized Value" (value of all property in a taxing entity) portion of the tax levy equation?
Remember:  Tax Levy ÷ Equalized Value x 1000 = Mill Rate

Many taxing entities, including the Sun Prairie School District, are using 0% as their projected "growth" in the equalized valuation.  Last year, Sun Prairie itself was negative by almost 5%.  Have we really maintained status quo (0%) if home values have dropped even further?  Hmm?

Remember that with no change in the tax levy, a 1% drop in the "projected" Equalized Valuation translates to a 1% INCREASE in the mill rate.

Gee...those raises in DeForest might become even harder to bear on the peoples' pockets.

Saturday, April 30, 2011

What a Difference a Day Makes

At Monday's Finance Committee meeting, Treasurer and Finance Chair Jim McCourt was all "Man the torpedoes and we can cut this budget". That sentiment didn't last long as at Tuesday's Board Work-Study meeting, his tone changed from cutting to increasing spending. Maybe he was on a sugar high Monday night??

While preventing a levy increase might not be in the cards, McCourt was optimistic that school board members would be able to decrease the levy increase. “One of our board goals was a 10 percent or above fund balance. Even with that, we are going to be 11.5 percent at the end of next year, so obviously one of the options that is out there is we’ve got some extra fund balance that potentially we could use, and if we made an adjustment of another $450,000 to the fund balance, it would get us down to a levy increase of 2.5 percent. It would still keep us at 10.5 percent of the fund balance. I think we have some room there to potentially do something.
---Jim McCourt

McCourt also said that even though the board added $255,000 back into the building and grounds department budget, he has not heard anyone asking for the budget restoration. If the reinstated dollars were removed again, it would decrease the levy by another 0.6 percent, bringing the levy increase down to 1.9 percent.
---excerpted from the Sun Prairie Star

Whalen offers a different perspective
During the work-study meeting, the board reviewed the district's request to add the following to the 2011-12 budget:
$75,000 originally planned for the HR Specialist; District still thinks they can use this cash
$165,000 (7000 hrs @ $24/hr) for Response to Intervention Math/Reading tutors
$110,000 for 2FTE English as Second Language Teachers
$ 176,000 for 3 total FTE Social Workers
$65,000 for 1 FTE Technology programmer
-----------------------------------------------
$591,000 (raises the tax levy about 1.3%)

Whalen's response:
"I like these ideas. I'm toying with the idea of going back to 4.5% [tax levy increase] and putting all these in [the budget]."

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Time To Re-evaluate Board Budget Parameters?

Yesterday's State Journal reported that overall property values over the past 12 months have declined, on average, by 0.8%. While that's encouraging news given the 4-5% decline seen last year, it still suggests problems for the 2011-12 SPASD budget.
One of the key budget parameters was to keep the mill rate increase below (gulp) 4.5%. While the McCourt's of the world will wave their hands and say that property values don't affect the budget, that's a little smoke and mirrorsy, and borders on being disingenuous. It's true that property values do not affect the budget, but property values ABSOLUTELY DO affect the mill rate. In fact, assuming no change in the tax levy, each 1% decrease in property values translates to a 1% INCREASE to the mill rate.

Since the board budget assumptions includes a property value (aka Equalized Value) increase of 0%, if Madison is taste of things to come, then we may find a similar 1% decrease in value. That means the target mill rate just climbed to 5.5%.

Yeah,yeah... we know ...the Rubenesque lady ain't singin' yet. But....it's not like there's been a huge amount of growth in the city here. Certainly nothing big enough to impact a $4B district-wide valuation. And area homes aren't exactly selling at prices that reflect a valuation increase.

That means, folks, that it's time the board got the pruning shears out.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Key Budget Numbers That Have NOT Been Made Clear

Tomorrow night is your LAST kick at the cat before the Annual Meeting.
If you are concerned about the budget, you MIGHT wanna show up and speak your peace at the Finance Committee (5:30 pm).  Then stick around for the official school board vote at their 7:30 meeting



The current budget planning calls for a 0% increase [NO DECREASE] in the district Equalized Value (net value of all real property in the district).  Madison and Dane County Equalized valuations are in and the numbers point to at least a 3% decline in Equalized Value.  How does this affect property taxes?

IF the Equalized Value is "flat" 0%

Tax Levy =           $   46,535,625 x 1000 = $11.93 Mill rate 
Equalized Value= $3,901,503,850 

A  5.2% increase over 2009
Tax on a $200K home= $2,385.52

IF the Equalized Value drops 1%
Mill rate= $12.05 (+6.2%)   $2,409.62 Tax on a $200K home
IF the Equalized Value drops 2%
Mill rate= $12.17 (+7.3%)    $2,434.21 Tax on a $200K home
IF the Equalized Value drops 3%
Mill rate= $12.30 (+8.4%)     $2,459.30 Tax on a $200K home 

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Some Bad News: Equalized Values Lower Than Expected

On Friday August 13, the Department of Revenue released their annual Equalized Values report. This report is a major piece of the property tax puzzle.  Once we know what the tax levy will be, the mill rate is determined by dividing Tax Levy by the Equalized Value of all real property in a district or community.

The equalized values are based on data from January 1, 2009 and January 1, 2010, when the national economy and housing market dipped to its lowest point. In Wisconsin residential property values fell by 3.5 percent, or $12.9 billion, over that time period.
Equalized values are calculated annually to ensure statewide fairness and equity in property tax distribution. An equalized value represents an estimate of a taxation district's total taxable value, and provides for the fair apportionment of taxation district levies (including school districts and counties) to each municipality. Changes in equalized value do not necessarily translate into a change in property taxes.

8-yr Trend (City of Sun Prairie)
A quick glance of the 8 yr track record of equalized values for the city of Sun Prairie show the phenomenal growth, including a maximum of 25% increase in equalized value in 2004.  However, things have changes since the recession took hold in fall 2008.  For 2009, the net change in equalized value was flat (0%).  For 2010, we saw a drop of 5%.  That is amazing given an average increase in equalized value of 13% for the 5yr period from 2003 to 2008.


Total Equalized Values for SPASD communities 2010
If one averages the change in equalized values for all the communities that make up the Sun Prairie Area School District, we see that the average reduction for all is  -4.04% .
But....that involves the TOTAL values.  And clearly, while Madison has a total equalized value of over $23 billion, only a small portion of Madison lies within the Sun Prairie Area School District.  So, we need to re-apportion these values to a more proper reflection of their contribution to the whole "pie".

While the town of Blooming Grove actually experienced a 1.6% increase in equalized value over 2009, less than 1% (0.83%) of Blooming Grove's property falls within the SPASD.   Therefore, that increase will not impact us much.


"Re-apportioned" Equalized Values for SPASD communities 2010
Clearly we don't have all the keys to the magic kingdom, but it is equally clear that we know, from  annual school tax levy reports, exactly how much tax levy from each of the 10 cities and towns that make up the Sun Prairie Area school district.

And once we know that, we can take the percentage share from THIS year's equalized values and project the new equalized value for the district.
For instance, last year, we know that only $623,820,761 of the City of Madison's  equalized value contributed to the Sun Prairie Area School district.  While this accounted for 15.84% of the total equalized value for SPASD, it only represented 2.7% of Madison's total equalized value.  Therefore, we can take 2.70% of Madison's 2010 Equalized value ($22,212,095,800, a 3.97% LOSS), and apply that dollar amount to SPASD's total for 2010.  We can use this same approach for the other 9 municipalities that comprise SPASD.)

We may be off by a small degree, but it would take some major corrections to turn -4.4% into 0%.  Not gonna happen, folks.
Fall 2009 School District Certification of Full Equalized Value - Tax Apportionment

Why do you even care?
You should care, because the equalized value is the "denominator" in the mill rate equation.  For the less math-minded, as the denominator shrinks, the mill rate INCREASES by the same amount.
Projected mill rate as of 8-27-2010 was $11.90.  This is based on a 0% growth in the Equalized Value ($3,937,400,000).  If we know the result (mill rate) and the denominator (Equalized Value), then the numerator (tax levy) has to be $46,850,000, give or take a few thousand $.
If the equalized value drops 4.4% to $3,760,000,000, then the mill rate increases 4.4% to $12.46.  That's a net increase of $0.56, which translates to an extra $112 on a $200,000 home.
Looking at it another way, assuming our equalized value projections are accurate, in order to retain the mill rate of $11.90, the tax levy must be reduced by another 4.4%, or about $2.1M.


What is "Equalized Value"?
The estimated value of all taxable real and personal property in each taxation district, by class, as of January 1 and certified by the Department of Revenue on August 15 of each year. The value represents market value (most probable selling price), except for agricultural property, which is based on its use (ability to generate agricultural income) and agricultural forest and undeveloped lands, which are based on 50% of their full (fair market) value.
--2010 Guide for Property Owners http://www.revenue.wi.gov/pubs/slf/pb060.pdf )

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Rollercoaster Budget Ride

The July 1st Finance Committee and School Board meetings offered a rollercoaster ride of good news and not-so-good news on the budget front.

Good News: July 1 Initial State Aid Estimate UP
Phil Frei reported that the district had budgeted on receiving approximately an 11% increase in state aid (the increase related to the 4K program). The July 1st estimate from DPI indicates an increase of approximately 12.5% is expected.

That means about $300,000 MORE in state aid, and thus $300K LESS for the tax levy

Not So Good News: Special Elector's Meeting could increase Busing Costs
At the full meeting of the school board, a special elector's meeting was scheduled for July 28, in response to a petition (as per state statutes) containing at least 100 citizen signatures calling for a special meeting of the district electors (anyone of voting age that has lived in the district at least 10 days). The item up for vote is to change the maximum distance that middle school students must walk before district bus transportation is provided from 2.0 miles to 1.5 miles.

If a majority of electors who come out for the July 28 meeting vote in favor of the change, the net effect will be to increase district busing costs by about $292,000 for 2010-11, which will increase in future years.

If the busing change is approved...and that certainly looks to be the outcome, then the effect of the increased aid is effectively negated.

Not So Good News: Equalized Value Projection LOWERED
Following discussions with the city, Phil Frei recommended that the projection for property values district-wide (the "Equalized Value") be lowered from an initial estimate of 1% growth to 0% growth.

This means that because the Equalized Value is decreased by 1%, then the Mill Rate increases by 1%. A projected $12.00 per $1,000 of assessed value mill rate now projects out at $12.12 ($30 additional property tax on a $250K home).

SP-EYE - Hmmm....play back those Finance Committee DVDs. We think you'll find that citizen representative on the Finance Committee Rick Mealy pressed the committee back in the spring to use a 0% growth estimate. Of course the committee disagreed and voted to use the 1% growth estimate. What a difference 6 weeks makes. eh? Mealy's rationale was that all indicators at that time pointed to a net 0% increased in property values; in fact the City of Sun Prairie was basing ITS budget on 0% growth. In addition, it is far better to initiate budget discussions with a worst case scenario and then as projections become more solid, a brighter picture for the mill rate might emerge. It's better to go into the Annual Elector's Meeting with better news...right? Now we've told the community to expect a mill rate of $12.00 and in one fell swoop, it increases to $12.12.

The net effect of these three changes (since the increase in state aid and the increased busing costs are basically a wash) is to increase the projected mill rate to $12.12.

Factoid of the Week: (based on current budget parameters) Every $1M change in the tax levy changes the mill rate about about $0.25.
So...either cutting or increasing the tax levy by each $1M changes the mill rate by 25 cents.

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Does Madison Property Assessment Decline Affect Us?

The headline of today's Wisconsin State Journal rang loud and clear:
property assessments declined for the first time in 35 years . The average drop is 3.1%.

That's bad news for homeowners on two fronts:

1. If you're trying to sell your home, plan on getting less for it.

2. Also plan on paying higher property taxes.

What? Hold on a sec! If my property is assessed less, don't I PAY LESS property tax?
Wrong. Dead wrong.
Property taxes don't go down unless spending is increasing at a rate less than that of property assessments. This includes, of course, both existing properties and new (from the previous year) developments/construction. When that happens, the costs are spread over a larger tax base, meaning each individual property owner pays a smaller share.

New values don't directly bring higher taxes but shifts the burden among taxpayers, said Todd Berry, president of the Wisconsin Taxpayers Association. "Falling assessments don't mean falling tax bills," he said. "We're probably going to be paying more property taxes.

Because the recession deepened last year, assessed values for every type of real estate - homes, condos, apartments, commercial buildings - dropped for 2010. Only personal property assets, like business equipment, which account for a sliver of the city's value, rose slightly for 2010.


Mill Rate Review
The mill rate is calculated as: Tax Levy ÷ Equalized Value
Tax Levy (of the taxing authority)
divided by
Equalized value (of all real estate in the district)
...and remember, the units are dollar per dollar of assessed value.
You typically see the mill rate expressed in dollars per $1,000 of assessed value.
To get this figure, simply multiply the calculated mill rate by 1000.

All things being equal...
If the Tax Levy does not change
and the Equalized Value DROPS 1%
then the Mill Rate RISES 1%

so if we do not want a drop in equalized value to affect property taxes, the only solution is to REDUCE the Tax Levy by the same amount as the reduction in Equalized Value
...and that means the budget needs to be trimmed.

Simplified Property Tax Scenario
Imagine a fictional school district:
• 1000 houses each valued at 200,000; total property value = $ 200,000,000
• 25 businesses, total property value = $200,000,000
• Total Equalized Value=$400,000,000

• School district budget: $8,000,000
• State Aid (remains constant from last year) = 50%, $4,000,000
• Tax Levy= $4,000,000 (make up difference between budget and state aid).

• Mill rate = 4,000,000/400,000,000 = 0.01
• Mill rate = $10.00 per $1000 assessed value
• $200,000 home pays.........$ 2,000.00

If property values drop 2%
Now Equalized value= $ 392,000,000

…and school spending doesn't change…
• Tax levy (unchanged from proposal)= $ 4,000,000
• Mill rate is now $ 0.010204
• Mill rate (per $1,000 assess value) $ 10.20
• $200,000 home now pays $ 2,040.82
…which is 2% more than if Equalized Value stays flat

Does this affect Sun Prairie?
The school district budget --at least the "rough draft" we've seen to-date---is based on the assumption of a 1% rise in the "Equalized Value" (which is the total value of all property in the district). If Madison property assessments are dropping an average of 3.1%, what's the likelihood that Sun Prairie assessments (and Equalized Value) will RISE 1%?

Obviously, we don't know the total yet (although the individual cites and towns in the district could give us their projected totals--hint, hint).

BUT...what we CAN do is check the Sun Prairie city assessor's website and look at the property assessments which are now complete and on-line.. A cursory glance of a handful of properties seems to suggest a FLAT assessment....meaning a 0% increase.

That means that the school district "rough draft budget" (for lack of a better term) is planning on spreading the tax levy over 1% more value than will actually result. Since the denominator (equalized value) appears to be lower than expected (0% growth vs. 1% growth), that means the result of the mill rate equation will INCREASE. Begging 1000 pardons for forcin' y'all to remember your long division rules.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

2010-11 Tax Levy Picture If We Don't Stop the Madness

Rough Projections for 2011-12 (assuming NO recurring budget cuts)


Please...take these projections with a grain of salt. The assumptions used are that the state economy and equalized aid picture doesn't change very much (which seems valid). It assumes a 3% increase in property value...which we think is pretty Pollyanna. Lastly, it assumes the district continues their spend-happy ways and increases its expenditures by 6%.


That being said...at least we can offer them. The school district holds this information very close to the vest.

  • Budgeted Expenditures (up 6%) : $ 72.6M
  • Projected state aid (44% of expenditures): $ 32.0M
  • That leaves $40.6M of expenditures paid through general fund tax levy
  • Then we have to add another $9.5M for debt service levy
  • That makes for a total tax levy projection of: $ 50.1M
  • Which translates to an increase of 13.2% over what was levied this year.
  • That 13.2% is the "bounceback" being discussed.
    ...and it could be even higher due to costs associated with opening the new high school.
  • Assume the equalized value (of all property) rises 3% to $ 4,020,000,000 (which is a pretty optimistic projection)
  • Mill rate is calculated as TAX LEVY divided by the EQUALIZED VALUE
  • That translates to a mill rate of $12.47

...and it could be mnuch higher than that...if the equalized property value stays flat, the mill rate climbs to $12.86 per $1,000.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

What Are Similar Size Districts Doing Budget-Wise?

The Sun Prairie school board and district administration like to play the role of the lonely victim. Reality is that EVERY school district in the state is facing the same challenges as Sun Prairie. How other school boards rise to the challenge, however, is a distinguishing characteristic.

SP-EYE reviewed the top 5-6 districts both with lower and higher enrollments as ours and took a peek at THEIR budget process. We wonder how come our own board doesn't do this kind of due diligence. These other districts haven't yet removed the words "cut", "reduction", or "freeze" from their vocabularies.

Interesting take on the subject of cuts.

5 districts just larger in size than Sun Prairie
Beloit
Beloit Daily News article 10-7-09

Board gets first look at potential 5.94% levy hike"I’m very concerned about increasing mill rate knowing how many individuals in Beloit are currently struggling," member Shannon Scharmer said.
Initial projections show the tax levy could increase by 5.94 percent, or just under $700,000. The total levy would be $12,484,843.The School District of Beloit board cut nearly $4 million last spring but, like districts across the state, received a whammy when the governor’s budget reduced education funds by 3 percent. "How do you not tax knowing that the way that the state has now rigged the game you can’t continue to reduce to fix this?" he said. "You don’t want to be forced into ‘you have to tax to the limit of your funding position.’"

The board may need to cut another $506,671, but noted he has yet to factor in the federal stimulus money, among other details. He and Thompson also are learning about the district’s staffing needs, which was also brought into focus after the Third Friday Count showed Beloit Memorial High lost 63 students.

Board member John Winkelmann suggested the executive team develop possible reduction items so the board can begin discussions before the budget adoption meeting.Perhaps this is the year the district discusses its priorities with the community and whether it needs to provide everything to everybody, Winkelmann said. For example, he said, does Beloit need to have every Advanced Placement course, or is it OK to let the students take that class elsewhere."We’ve got to think about that question because the ability to pay is not out there right now," Winkelmann said. "Everything is going down." As member John Acomb said, "We’re open to a lot of ideas."

La Crosse
Article on LaCroose budget 7-21-09

The property tax rate for La Crosse public schools would go up by $1.43 under a proposed 2009-10 budget presented to the school board Monday.

The proposed tax rate would be $12.09 per $1,000 of assessed property value, compared with $10.66 in the 2008-09 budget year, according to figures presented by Janet Rosseter, executive director of business services.

District officials expect the $12.09 tax rate to be "the worst-case scenario" for 2009-10 but won't know until factors such as enrollment, state equalization aid and school levy credits are determined. Recent numbers from the state Department of Public Instruction show the tax rate could be closer to $11.70, Rosseter said.

Final figures won't be known until October, when the district's final enrollment figures are in and the state sets its equalized property values. Rosseter used a 2 percent decrease in equalized value.


West Bend
West Bend article

West Bend School District Superintendent Patricia Herdrich blamed talk radio for driving much of the crowd that packed Badger Middle School for Monday's annual meeting, where a recommended 12.1% tax increase was rejected.

West Bend- MKE Journal-Sentinel 10-6-09

The School Board is recommending making $300,000 in changes to its proposed 2009-'10 budget in an attempt to minimize property tax increases. West Bend School District Superintendent Patricia Herdrich said the changes may mean a levy increase of 9% over the 2008-'09 school year, which is still less than previously had been suggested.

Going into its annual meeting last week, district administrators had recommended a property tax increase 12.1% higher than the year before. District electors rejected the recommended levy at the annual meeting, in a vote that is advisory to the school board.
District officials revised its estimated levy increase to 9.9% by the time of Monday's work session for the school board, where they recommended further budget changes.

Half of the recommended reduction in the estimated levy would come from reducing cleaning in buildings. The second largest item recommended by the board would be a salary freeze for district administrators, estimated to save $80,000 in 2009-'10. The board also recommended raising $20,000 in revenue from increasing facility use fees for the community and restricting salaries for custodial and technical staff, for a saving of $50,000.

In an e-mail announcing the recommendations, Herdrich said the changes would mean the district would be levying below state-allowed revenue limits. "This will make the gap larger next year as we plan for next year's reductions," she wrote. "It is highly likely the 2011-12 and 2012-13 budgets will be equally challenging due to loss of stimulus dollars."

Wauwatosa
Wauwatosa NOW 6-17-09

A first look at the Wauwatosa School District's 2009-10 budget proposal reveals many variables, all waiting on firm numbers from state legislators. John Mack, district director of business services, said the current version of next year's proposed $77.2 million budget is one of the most difficult he's ever created because of that ongoing uncertainty.

As of right now, the district's 2009-10 budget calls for a $43.4 million property tax levy, an 8.59 percent increase over the $40 million levy for the current budget. Property tax rates would increase to $8.09 per $1,000 of equalized property value, a hike of 64 cents per $1,000 of value.
Superintendent Phil Ertl said next year's property tax rate ultimately might be lower than proposed, but district officials won't have solid guesses about amounts until the dust settles at the state level. State lawmakers have said they expect a finished budget in July.
Mack said he and district administrators carefully considered each expenditure, including all staffing positions, to make the estimates included in the proposal. At $64.1 million, staff salaries and benefits make up 83 percent of the proposed budget, up from 80.12 percent this year. Mack suggested that School Board members consider reining in staffing costs in the future to help reduce the overall budget.

Neenah
Neenah article

The 2009-10 Neenah school budget calls for a 7 percent increase in property taxes but still shows spending exceeding revenues, a practice that officials had sworn off in recent years. The Board of Education reviewed a draft of the $84.1 million budget Tuesday. It would require the owner of a $150,000 home to pay $1,298 in school taxes. That's $89 more than last year.

The budget has a structural deficit of $600,000. That means if savings cannot be found during the school year, the school district will have to use cash reserves to fund ongoing operations. Neenah had structural deficits from 2003-04 to 2006-07, with the shortfall reaching a high of $3.7 million in 2005-06. The practice was criticized at the time as unsustainable.

"I am not so upset that we might take out $600,000 this year," Lehman said. "We put $3 million into the kitty over the last two years." Neenah's cash reserves rose from $7.9 million in 2007 to $10.9 million this year. The balance was helped by a referendum that empowered the school district to levy an extra $2.6 million in 2007-08, $2.2 million in 2008-09 and $1.2 million in 2009-10 to cover operational expenses.

Neenah's budget accounts for a 1.8 percent decrease in staff (12.65 fewer positions) and a stable enrollment.

5 districts just smaller than Sun Prairie

Oak Creek-Franklin
Franklin NOW article 9-2-09

A Franklin School District resident with a home valued at $200,000 can expect to see a $62 increase in school taxes this fall as residents have approved a 2009-10 budget that includes a tax levy hike of 3.9 percent. About 25 district residents approved the $30.6 million levy at the district's annual meeting last week. Because some factors have not yet been determined, the budget could change between now and when it becomes official later this fall.

The tax rate is expected to increase by 2.9 percent, to $11.35 per $1,000 of assessed property value. The district's total operating budget will be about $49 million, a 2.4 percent increase over last year's $47.8 million budget.

School Board member Dave Szychlinski said it was a tough budget to prepare in light of the recession, especially given many residents' own financial battles. "We know that people are struggling, many people in our community have lost their jobs, and yet we have an obligation to prepare our young people for their futures," he said.

The district was forced to make some tough decisions because of losses in state aid, and officials made about $833,500 in cuts, he said. Next year will likely bring more cuts, Szychlinski added.
Officials also decided not to begin a 4-year-old kindergarten program after the state withdrew funding for start-up programs.

The district picked up about $379,700 in additional revenue by adding 67 seats through the state's Open Enrollment program, which allows non-resident students to attend Franklin schools.

D C Everest Area
DC Everest Annual Meeting booklet

Tax levy increases 0.24%; mill rate unchanged at $9.52.

Wisconsin Rapids
Wisconsin Rapids Tribune 10-20-09

The Wisconsin Rapids School District tax rate will increase for the first time in six years this fall -- the result of falling property values and state aid cuts, administrators said.

District residents will see a mill rate of $8.93 per $1,000 of equalized property value, about 12 percent higher than last year's figure of $7.98. The district's total tax levy in Business Services Director Dan Weigand's proposed budget was about $19 million, about a 9 percent increase from 2008.

Manitowoc

Manitowoc article 10-14-09

At its October 13th meeting, the Board of Education approved a $71.7 million budget for the current school year, a 2.24% increase from last year. The total property tax levy will increase 4.35% to $18.6 million, but the net tax levy rate (homeowners' cost-per-thousand) is expected to be relatively flat due to an increase in area property value overall.

Since budget planning began in February 2009, the Board made $2.3 million worth of reductions to keep the numbers under the state-imposed revenue cap. Cost-control decisions included a reduction of one central office administrator, a 5% across-the-board reduction in supplies and materials, reduction of 5.5 teachers, reduction of 3.5 paraprofessionals, elimination of EXCEL advocates and library aides, and a superintendent salary freeze, among others. Not all union contracts are finalized, but some employee groups have made voluntary concessions in light of the tight budget

Hudson
Hudson website Annual meeting document

Board makes $2.35 M in cuts to avoid a 20.25% mill rate increase. Mill rate of $7.82 represents an 11.06% increase. Tax levy of $28.4M represents an 8.25% increase. Proposal includes reducing

Sunday, October 18, 2009

The Will of the People? Or the Words of the Lawyer?

A hearty "THANK YOU" goes out to the nearly 200 residents who came out to the annual meeting last Monday night to vote on the annual school district tax levy.

But your work MAY NOT be complete.

Tomorrow at 6:30 PM in room 100 of the School District office (501 S, Bird St.), the school board will sit down to finalize the budget and direct administration as to what number to use for the tax levy.

The board/administration was looking for $46.25M.
The people voted to set the levy at $44.25M...or $2M less than what the board/district wanted.

Muddying the waters were the words of the school district attorney, Mike Julka. Responding to an audience question regarding what happens if no levy is voted upon, or if the people vote for a lower (than requested) levy....

According to Mike Julka, attorney present at the meeting for legal consultation, if the electors did not adopt a levy or adopted one that is insufficient to support SPASD operations, the school board will adopt a levy that is sufficient. The board must adopt a budget for the 2009-10 school year no later than Nov. 1.
---The Sun Prairie STAR, 10/13/09


Now, we don't mean to sound the alarm. A reasonable mind would say that the levy voted by the community was not "insufficient", since there is about $8M in fund balance, and in light of last minute information that will increase the amount of state aid and reduce the necessary tax levy.

But...with our school board, past history has shown that we are not always dealing with reasonable minds. Blindly-supportive-of-district-administration bobbleheads, yes....but any voice of reason left the school board table several years ago.

So for that reason, if you can at all attend tomorrow's meeting, you should do so. The school board may still believe that last Monday was all just a bad dream. If residents pack the room to monitor for shenanigans, however, the board just might be reminded that it all happened.




Agenda for10/19/2009 SCHOOL BOARD WORK-STUDY MEETING,
6:30 p.m. at the District Office (Room 100), 501 S. Bird St., Sun Prairie.
Chair: John Whalen

1. Opening Items
......1.01 Call to Order, Roll Call, Affirmation of Public Notice
2. Discussion
......2.01 Discuss 2009-2010 School Year Budget and Tax Levy to provide direction to the administration for the preparation of documents and materials for the School Board meeting on October 26
3. Adjournment
......3.01 Adjourn the meeting
Note:
Upon reasonable notice, effort will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals through appropriate aids and services. For additional information or to request this service, contact the District Office, 501 S. Bird St., Sun Prairie, WI 53590 (608) 834-6502.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Can You Hear Us Now????

Dear School Board...
We've been trying to communicate to you OUR wishes for some time now. You...who were elected to represent US. But you refused to listen.

And so, on Monday night, the winds of change blew at a gale force. And this time, you can't just ignore the message and rationalize that it comes from just a Couch...or a Fetterly...or a Mealy...or even a stand-up guy, like John Welke, whom you accuse of having ulterior motives. Because it came from almost 200 community members.

This time the community came out in force to attend the annual meeting that you do as little as possible to publicize. And they came out in record numbers. You want to know WHY they came out? Because the WE gave them ALL the information...the WE told them that the tax levy was in the electors' hands---not yours.

We told you that we don't trust you. And we put an exclamation point on it by electing alderman Hariah Hutkowski to chair the meeting, which has historically been the role of the board president.

We told you that it was preposterous for you to be doling out 3.8% (or more) raises to administration and admin support staff when the rest of the world was facing job and wage cuts. But you played Santa with our hard-earned tax dollars anyway. So we voted to cut YOUR salaries by 5% so that you might better understand the pain being experienced by the people that elected you...the people that approved over $130M in school buildings in the past 4 years. The very people that helped you out when you needed it, yet whom you turned your backs on in THEIR time of need.

We told you that the 12.56% mill increase was too much...and to make cuts in the budget. But you refused. But our pleas to use fund balance to lower the mill rate fell on deaf ears. So we voted 124 to 60 to reduce the tax levy by $2M, which should effectively drop your proposed mill rate increase of $1.32 by about 50 cents.

Any questions?
How does it feel to be on the other side of the fence? They say that a picture is worth 1,000 words, and the picture of school board president John Whalen sitting with his back to the community for virtually the entire meeting sure spoke volumes. One resident asked you to explain your rationale for giving huge raises in times of salary reductions and lost jobs. But you all refused to answer her.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

The Numbers You Need to Know

Hopefully many of you can attend Monday's annual elector's meeting to cast your vote regarding the school district budget for 2009-10.

We all want to have the best education possible for our children. But we lso believe that we don't have to break the bank to do so. In tough economic times, we have to be particularly vigilant with regard to spending and impose some fiscal conservatism on our free-spending school board.

We're not anti-education. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth. We believe in a strong quality eduication delivered with fiscal restraint and fidelity to funding.

Please keep these numbers in mind Monday:

$46,249,461 - That's the amount of tax the school board proposes to levy. YOURE VOTE decides how much of a levy they can actually set.

$8,000,000 - The amount in "fund balance", some of which COULD be used to offset the tax levy...but your school board voted not to do that.

$5,160,700 - The amount by which district spending exceeds revenues.

$1,454,892 - SPEA(teachers) contract increase

$640,000 - net deficit due to 4K program start-up

$183,060 - The cost of procuring the last installment of high school funds, which should have been taken out of the debt service or special project accounts, but your school board voted to add it to your tax levy.

$161,348 - Total compensation of Dr. Culver

$110,693 - Approximate cost of 3.8% raise for administrators

$110,000 approximate additional state aid from increased enrollment--which has yet to be discussed.

$83,685 - additional Microsoft technology money which COULD have been used to lower the mill rate, but wasn't.

$80,000 - Cost of Admin Support raises (ranged as high as 13%)

12.56% - the increase in tax levy over last year

7.6% - the increase in the Dane county property tax portion

$11.85 - the proposed mill rate for 2009-10 (if you vote to approve the proposed tax levy)

$1.32 the proposed mill rate increase over last year

$0.97 - The portion of the mill rate increase resulting from increases in spending.

$0.36 - The portion of the mill rate increase resulting from high school construction project.

Friday, October 9, 2009

Explaining the Mill Rate Increase


So...by now many of you have become more informed.
You know that the school tax levy mill rate is increasing by about $1.32

But why?

Is it the high school construction? Or something else?
The answers can be found if you pry into the Annual Meeting Booklet"

The total tax levy is proposed to be $46,249,461
The increase in levy over last year is $5,160,700
This is broken down into 2 "portions":
.......The "general budget" levy increase: $ 3,778,246______ $ 0.97
.......The debt service levy: $1,386,766_______ $ 0.36

The high school construction accounts for only $0.36 (28%) of the proposed $1.28 mill rate increase. Clearly, it's not the construction that causing the large increases.
Hmmm...big salary increases coming home to roost?