Showing posts with label insurance premiums. Show all posts
Showing posts with label insurance premiums. Show all posts

Friday, March 18, 2011

Oh...so NOW you Want Equity, Eh???

Tim Culver wants equity? Puuh-LEEZE! 
"...it is in my heart to speak up for these 31
employees and say let all employees take the pain at the same time."
                                                ---District Administrator Tim Culver
Equity? or a 12" pianist?
 Oh...sure he wants equity...now that it's his wallet (and that of other administrators and admin support staff) that is taking the hit. 

Where was Culver's desire for equity over the past number of years while Local 60 folks have continually received the short end of the stick and basically been screwed, blued, and tattooed!??? 

Culver wants the board to hold off until July 1 before requiring the Culver bunch to pay their 5.8% contribution to the WRS system and increase their share of health insurance to 9%. Hello!!!! Local 60 staff...you know ...the ones that are barely making ends meet NOW...have been paying 9% of the health insurance premiums for some time now! link to our earlier post on the issue

How about what's good for the goose now becomes good for the gander, eh?
This would save the school district over $32,000 THIS YEAR!  We're feeling a tad Robin Hoodie and would like to see the HAVEs start helping out the HAVE NOTs.....NOW!

Read Culver's plea in the form of a Situation Report
Culver's proposed motion: 
“For those employees with whom the Board does not have a contractual provision that obligates the employer to pay the employee's share of the Wisconsin Retirement System, the Board shall, for internal compensation equity purposes, reimburse the affected employee an amount equivalent to the employee's Wisconsin Retirement System share of WRS, as required by Senate Bill 11.  The compensation shall appear as miscellaneous income to the employee on the employee's W-2 only for a period of the first payroll after March 13, 2011, through and including June 30, 2011.”

We'd like to make a motion from the floor, please.  How's about...

Motion: The board shall take action to implement 5.8% WRS contributions and 9% health insurance premiums effective 4-1-11 (and that's no April Fool) for all Administrative and Administrative Support staff.  The effective "savings" from these contributions during the 2010-11 school year shall be used to purchase 2011-12 school supply packages for students who qualify for free/reduced lunches.

How do you like them apples?

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Boo Frick'n Hoo!

Pardon our French.
But seriously... we have had just about enough of this whining.


Who's whining now?
Well...since you asked...we're hearing that the Administrative Support staff are not happy with the package presented to them last night:

  • 1%  pay raise
  • pay 1% more towards the cost of health insurance premiums
  • pay 2% more towards the cost of dental insurance premiums

We guess that, seeing that the district just received $1.75M from the feds, they believed that the candy store was back open for business.  Someone...a spokesperson for the group?...noted that the lowliest staffer will only receive a net $0.04 to $0.10 hourly increase.




An astute reader pointed out to us that the Admin Support staff ALSO gained a furlough day back AND get an increase that relates to where they fit on the "grid".
DOUBLE Boo Frick'n Hoo!





Again...BOO FRICK'N HOO!  Many people saw either NO increase or had their wages cut, or lost their jobs!!!!  What makes school district employees so damn special?
Welcome to the recession, folks.  Under the dome under which the school district seems to reside, things may be rosy.  But, for the rest of us, here in the real world, not so much.


Be happy you are employed....others aren't so lucky.
Be happy that you are actually getting a raise...many others got no raise and furlough days.
Be happy that you aren't having to pay as much towards healthcare as state employees or (heaven forbid) Local 60 staff.


These are the same people that received a very nice new pay grid LAST SUMMER.
Click here to see the salary grid...see if YOU think they are underpaid.



When is the sense of entitlement that runs rampant through this district going to end?



Maybe Y'all Can Keep These in Mind


Do you people not read the papers?

Have you ANY clue as to the state of the economy?

http://www.channel3000.com/money/24831004/detail.html  Wolf/SubZero Cutting 100 Madison Jobs [9-1-10]

http://www.channel3000.com/news/24922576/detail.html Harley-Davidson Could Cut 200 Jobs ]9-8-10]

http://www.nbc15.com/home/headlines/101414594.html Meriter Cutting 57 Jobs [9-3-10]

3-5% cuts for all Dane County employees

Loss of 2% raise plus 3% cut (16 furlough days) for state employees  in both 2010 and 2011




Sorry folks, but we...have had...ENOUGH!

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Statewide Benefit DIS-Parity?

A review of how a sampling of similar sized (to Sun Prairie) school districts reveals that generally--but not always-- AFSCME (American Federation of State, Country, and Municipal Employees) staffers generally get the short end of the benefit stick.

Heroes
We looked at 6 similar sized districts, and two stood out. Both Manitowoc and Middleton-Cross Plains school districts treat ALL employees equitably. Universal benefits are provided for all. The two were, however, at opposite ends of the budget spectrum. While Manitowoc seems to have established reasonable employee share costs of benefit packages, Middleton-Cross Plains throws caution to the wind and provides all benefits at no charge to the employees. Hmmm...no wonder why MCP is in the midst of a severe budget crisis.

Zeros
All the rest, including Sun Prairie. That makes 5 out 7, or 70%.

How can these school boards treat employee "classes" so differently and look at themselves in the mirror?
You'd think this might be something that a local or state newspaper might want to pick up on.
Of course, the STAR likes to play nicey-nice with the district. So we certainly couldn't expect Chris Mertes et al to expose something like this and use the old journalistic crowbar.


Saturday, May 29, 2010

17% Of The 800 lb. Gorilla

Caren Diedrich and Terry Shimek like to talk about the fact that nobody wants to talk about the "800 lb gorilla in the room". Funny...they don't talk about it themselves! All they do is talk about nobody wanting to talk about it.
Guess that's our cue...our raison d'ĂȘtre, s'il vous plait.

...and that's French for , "Yeah, baby! We'll talk about it!" We'll talk about whatever needs to be talked about.

We've said it before...that the SPASD budget is between 80 and 85% personnel costs. Roughly two-thirds of that 80-85% is salaries; the rest is fringe benefits--largely health insurance and dental insurance premiums.

How much? How about $11.5 MILLION just for the 2009-10 school year alone! That's right...and it's all public record. If you review the "check runs" from Finance Committee or school board meetings, you'll see that we pay about $870K per month on average for health insurance premiums, and another $100K per month for dental premiums.

And, for 2010-11, not only are we adding 22.4 more positions, but the costs are projected to increase by 5% for health insurance and 7% for dental insurance.

  • A 5% increase to health insurance costs for existing employees means an additional $430K to the 2010-11 budget.

  • A 7% increase to dental insurance costs for existing employees means an additional $80K to the 2010-11 budget.

  • At an average cost of $13,400 per employee times 22.5 new employees, translates to an additional $302K to the 2010-11 budget.

  • That comes to a grand total of $810K for the 2010-11 budget for health insurance and dental insurance premiums alone.
Funny...we don't recall seeing a slide that indicated that particular number at the budget hearing on May 20. Sure...people were told 5% and 7% increases...and that there would be 22.5 new staff. But never did anyone specifically say..."Oh, and hey, taxpayers...that all means an additional $810K to the --now---$72.3 M budget for 2010-11 for health insurance costs."

The insidiousness of these costs is, like a number of the nastier STDs, they represent the gift that keeps on giving. These costs INCREASE every year and with every new employee.

Sun Prairie's Very Own Silent Caste System?
You've heard of "stickin' it to the man"? Well, here in the Sun Prairie school district, we're sticking it to the very people (you know...the ones we value so much as demonstrated by Birthday KitKat bars) that are working deep in the trenches for the lowest wages: AFSCME Local 60 Support staff. These are the people that keep the buildings clean, cook and serve the breakfasts and lunches, playground aides, and serve as teacher and student aides.

They are paid the least amount for wages (well below the Adminosphere) and yet get stuck paying a phenomenally large portion of their health insurance premiums! These are the people that can LEAST afford to pay more out of their pocket. While those whose salaries are in the Adminosphere and the Culverosphere pay mere pocket change for their insurance "benefits", Local 60 members pay out "real money". To use a more recent analogy, while teachers and administrators fork over about the cost of a couple of large pizzas monthly for their benefits, Local 60 members fork over the equivalent of several MONTHS worth of grocery bills! Why are we stickin' it to Local 60?


What Needs To Be Done
First...we need to establish a benchmark for what percentage employees should pay out-of-pocket for their insurance benefits. Some will argue, but we suggest that a good place to start is state employees. According to 2009 data, Wisconsin state employees pay about 6.15% of their health insurance premiums. And, with the state budget woes, the potential to increase that percentage is high.

Poor local 60 is already paying 9% of their health insurance premiums and a whopping 14.5% of their dental, while teachers and administrators are paying WELL below of even the share that state employees pay. Those percentages need to be pushed back down to the zone of reason.

Second...we need to establish a level playing field. Eliminate the caste system mentality and have ALL district employees pay the same percentage. We value ALL employees equally...right? Then SHOW it!

Third...teachers and administrators are going to need to pick up a higher percentage of their health insurance costs. Oh, they won't like ole SP-EYE for this stance. But...you know what? Tough tooties. They have one hellacious deal, and we need to stop listening to the whining and start pushing. We understand and would push back on this ourselves, but it's fair and just.

Fourth...we need to do more to work towards joining with state employees so that the cost of these premiums is lowered.

The most important thing to understand is that Rome wasn't built in a day, and similarly, creating a level playing field will not be an overnight solution. We need to establish the benchmarks and communicate to the unions a plan for moving contracts to equity. What's good for state workers, is most certainly good enough for school district employees.

There...NOW the 800 lb gorilla has been (at least partially) exposed. Let the fireworks begin.

SP-EYE disclaimer: Administration will probably declare: All those figures are wrong! But they will offer no attempt to correct them., So let's just head that one off at the pass. The monthly district premium costs come directly from the last 12 months of district check runs. Those are fact. The average administrator salary, $93,000(2009-10) comes from DPI data. Same for teachers... average salary is $47,991 . Premium shares come directly from employee contracts obtained from the district website. The only question mark in the bunch was coming up with an "average" salary for Local 60 workers. (These folks get paid somewhere between $11 and 18.00 per hour, and retire at an average pay of about $17 per hour). They all get paid hourly (vs. salary) and work different numbers of contract days. We took Support Staff salary costs from the annual budget documents and divided that by the number of Local 60 staff. Then we checked some HR tables from school board packages. Subsequently in the worst case scenario, we believe the "average" local 60 salary used here ($24,000) to be biased high.

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

I'll See Your Little Blue Scoops and Raise the Ante

We couldn't sleep in the heat, so we offer this tasty tidbit. It came in smokin' hot over the wires just begging to be posted. Another reader writes about their perspective recent public hearing on the proposed budget. Enjoy...

BIG Blue Scoops
There is an item that a couple people touched on at the hearing, but nobody really wants to go there. I am talking about health and dental benefits and premiums.

For those that don't know the district has an extremely nice benefit package, that most people would love to be on. In the next years budget, the total cost of these two items is approximately $9 million dollars (thats a whopping 12.5% of the budget just for those premiums). [SP-EYE note: that might be a little low. The bill for April was $870,00 for health insurance and $98,000 for dental. Do the math, people] Those of us in the real word either pay for our coverage, if it can be afforded, or we usually pay a portion of the premium and our employer picks up the rest. It is not uncommon to pay 10% or more of that premium.

So, if all employee groups paid 10% of the premium, we would be saving $900K / year, and that is a permanent savings. Now the actual amount would be less than that because the employees already pay some of the health premium (none of the dental). For example, L60 pays 9% (why do they always get the sharp stick), admin and admin support each pay 4%, and teachers pay ....... wait for it......, yes, a fixed $100 / year!! [SP-EYE Note: our copy of the current contract states that the total amount paid is either $200 or $400 per year for a family...the lower amount being paid if the employee agrees to go through a --taxpayer funded---"Health Risk Assessment. Similar, annual out of pocket for a single employee is $75 or $150 ] Yes, in the last contract, they got 3.8% raise two years in a row and did not have to give anything up, great negotiating.

So, why not put a stake in the ground, and say that all groups WILL pay 10% starting in their next contract year, not negotiable, and start your contract negotiation from there? Of course the McCourts and Shimeks of the world will immediately say that they can not do that because we will lose in arbitration, [SP-EYE note: Fear not, citizen! For at least Mr.Shimek has to abstain from any employee contractually related votes because his wife is a district employee.] but they really need to open their eyes to what is going on around them.

There is another little anomaly that this would help get rid of as well. Today, if teachers choose not to be in the plan (i.e. say their spouse has a plan with another employer), we pay them! [SP-EYE: the reader i correct. We PAY employees $300/month---$3,600/yr to NOT take the health insurance] I don't know how many of those people there are, but this practice has to stop. The logic is that if it is free (or really low cost), then they will just sign up if we do not incent them to not sign up. If they have to pay for the benefit, problem solved.

At the end of day, no one wants anything taken away, but the above is reasonable, and it would fund most of the new teachers at the new buildings this year.

---Citizen That Would Rather Keep Their Two Pizzas A Month