Showing posts with label Jill Camber-Davidson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jill Camber-Davidson. Show all posts

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Catching Up With the 8 Days of Cringe-mas

OK...so SP-EYE took a little break to deal with Draco (who came up with that?), preparing for the possibility that the Mayans knew something, and snowblower issues.

For the 4th day of Cringe-mas, Caren Diedrich's name came out of the hat.  Caren's big gift is her very on ant farm.  An an farm can  provide hours of fun watching how things really should work.  Plus, Caren has the tools to make life interesting for some of the ants.  We now KNOW that Caren is running for election...again.  If she's re-elected, she will have been on the board since Sun Prairie was truly a small community.  Not quite since the streets were cobblestones...but close.

Not being mean here, but it's time for Caren to find something else to do with her time...volunteer more  in the schools, perhaps run for City Council....or play with the ants.  The board has changed but she has not changed with it.  Like John Whalen, she fully supports anything Tim Culver does.  The flip side of that is more important, however; by blindly supporting Dr. Culver, Caren fully supports what Culver is NOT doing.  There are cracks in the foundation and they need to be repaired before they cause more significant structural issues.

Along those lines, Santa is leaving her a copy of the article, "Life Beyond Superintendency".  Tim Culver is planning for retirement an Caren needs to plan for life beyond the school board.  The days of MaryEllen, Cheryl, and Caren piloting this ship are done.

Last but not least, a stocking stuffer:  a button declaring "Think Before You Speak".   Ms. Diedrich has been increasingly unleashing comment that are even to the left of bizarre.  As long as she remains on the board, Caren needs to put a little thought in before opening her mouth.

<hr>
<hr>
On the 5th day of Cringe-mas, Santa SP-EYE pulled the name of the other lady on the school board: Jill Camber-Davidson.

Santa's big gift for Jill is the meal that the Wizard of Oz gave to the Cowardly Lion.  NOT that we're suggesting that Jill is cowardly.  Far from it.  But she's on a board now full of strong voices, and she is more reserved.  But Santa thinks Jill ha a lot of good comments and questions in her and sometimes she may hold back.  This medal will hopefully remind her that she IS a valued member of this board and she should feel courageous enough to speak out.

Santa also has two other gifts for Jill as a reminder of where she is taking this  district.  Jill rightfully championed nixing the Pepsi contract a while back.  Santa found a vending machine which dispenses only fruits and veggies.  If kids are jonesing for a sack, this could and should be their choice.  We could even have these turned on during school hours.

Lastly we have a book about using a school wellness program to battle childhood obesity.  That is indeed a serious problem, and one we think Jill could really help us pave a path to at least some local solutions.

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Weber Grabs Top Vote Total

In a shades of 2010 result, when newcomer John Welke smoked the other incumbents, Tom Weber grabbed the most votes in the spring school board election.  Kinda sounds like this city wants change on its school board.

Over 5000 votes for the leader? In 2006, Jim Gibbs set a school board election record with over 3,800 votes. Weber shattered that. Hmmm. It was almost like there was something dragging people to the polls in droves. Wonder what that could be? Just can't quite put a finger on it....

Weber - 5,277
Camber Davidson - 4,870
Stackhouse - 3,532



Flying saucers could land
And it wouldn't make much difference to our man
He could walk onboard and thank the lord
And leave this damn town in seconds flat
Check his bags and never come back
Oh, our love is
Like a fuse that's burned out


---B-52's "Ain't It a Shame"

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Election Day - Time For More Change

The school board is slowly, but surely, becoming more aligned with what we the people expect in our representation. John Welke was a great addition last year...but he needs more support on the board. Welke needs someone who shares his (our) fiscal concerns and someone who won't play for the crowd--or a specific athletic group.


We think Tom Weber is that guy.


While the STAR (read: Chris Mertes) didn't care for Jill Camber Davidson's taking on advertising in our schools, we think that's exactly why she deserves another term. Is it really worth a 7-year exclusive contact and z little more than $10K a year from a certain soft drink manufacturer to subliminally advertise its wares to our kids? We don't think so. The board could find that money and a whole lot more if they would de-pants Phil Frei and take back OurDough.



While we appreciate Mr Stackhouse's efforts over the past 6 years, it's time for the face of our school board to change a little more. We don't quite see the steady hand that editor Mertes seems to see.
So on Tuesday, April 5, we say vote early and vote often.
But cast your votes for the two people that will best represent the Sun Prairie School District.
Vote for Tom Weber and Jill Camber Davidson

Sun Prairie School Board -- We find Jill Camber Davidson’s unwillingness to entertain advertising in school to be unrealistic, particularly with the current economy and potential future revenue cuts for schools.

Challenger Tom Weber’s approach relating to budgeting might be worth a look.
At the same time, we believe incumbent Dave Stackhouse should be returned to office. Despite his pursuit of upgrading Ashley Field, Stackhouse has proven to be a steady hand on the board.
Vote Stackhouse and either Camber Davidson or challenger Tom Weber April 5.

---Sun Prairie STAR 3-24-11

Sunday, January 30, 2011

That's Why They Call it a BUDGET, Jim!

At this past Monday's meeting of the school board's Financed Committee, the topic was "Initial Budget Parameters".  One of the key budget parameters is "mill rate increase".
" There's no way an increase to tax levy less than 4.5 percent would be able to support the budget." 
---School Board member Jim McCourt (as reported by the STAR)
Unfortunately, it was two of the three school board candidates (new-comer Tom Weber and incumbent Jill Camber-Davidson) that wanted to talk about setting a target ceiling on any mill rate increase.
“I’d like to throw out that we put a number out there.... It’s not that it can’t be changed, but I think it’s a starting point for the budgets”
--- (school board candidate) Tom Weber
Finance Committee chair Jim "SeaBass" McCourt was hesitant (to put it mildly) to set any limit.  In fact, the only way he was interested in setting any "parameter" on an acceptable mill rate increase was as a very loose "limit".

On the parameter affecting the local levy and mill rate, the committee approved on a 3-2 vote (Seabass, Diedrich, Rayford) putting a 4.5 percent increase as a current target to aim for while the budget process continues. Committee members Weber and Jill Camber Davidson voted against it because they thought the target percentage should have been lowered to 3 percent. 
 ----Sun Prairie STAR

Caren Diedrich added her typical zany antics to the meeting.  When it came time to vote on the issue of setting a 4.5% "soft target" for any mill rate increase, Diedrich commented, 

"Well, I'd like it to be less [than 4.5%] ...but I'm voting yes".
         -----Caren Diedrich (who could have voted no and forced a smaller target levy increase)

According to the current budget projections and forecast model, the proposed increase to the tax levy and mill rate would be 5.1 percent. And that is not factoring in any major hit to school funding that might come from the Governor.

Memo to Jim McCourt:
budget - a summary of intended expenditures along with proposals for how to meet them.

Jimbo...It's called a budget because you figure out what you can afford.  THEN you figure out how you plan to spend the money available.  WE --the people--- a at least 50% of your budget, Jim.  And you need to take the ability of the people to pay your taxes into account.  We all don't live in the lap of luxury.  We all can't afford to dine on sea bass.

Earth to McCourt!  If there's "no way" to support a mill rate less than 4.5%, then that means you need to get the big boy scissors out and start cutting that budget!



Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Stackhouse is in; We Got Us a Race!

Tom Weber, who has been a great addition as  current Citizen Representative to the School Board's Finance Committee, is a worthy candidate for school board.  Early indications suggest this is a race between Weber and Stackhouse for the 2nd seat.  


Many feel that Jill Camber-Davidson has come on strong of late as a board member who will take a stand against fiscal irresponsibility.  Ms. Camber-Davidson has also been leading the charge against advertising in our schools.  We believe her tenacity and attention to detail merit a 2nd term.


Tom Weber is very well spoken and has a strong financial background.  Incumbent David Stackhouse has provided some spark in the last year as he has rebelled against a board majority that gave him no love during officer elections.  During a number of officer votes, only a single vote was cast for Stackhouse for each board officer slot.  Hmmm...whose was it?  Stackhouse's  checkered history during his last board term has seen his stature reduced from board president to simply a board member at large.   Will the community vote for the refreshing air of change that Mr. Weber offers?  In the past, Stackhouse relied on strong support form the youth football community.  Is that support still there? Stay tuned.
Both incumbents Dave Stackhouse and Jill Camber Davidson will be joined by a third candidate, Tom Weber of Sun Prairie, in their campaign for the Sun Prairie School Board. Seats on the board are elected at-large within the Sun Prairie Area School District.

Candidates had until 5 p.m. on Tuesday, Jan. 4 to submit their nomination papers for elected offices. The general election will take place on Tuesday, April 5.
http://www.sunprairiestar.com/main.asp?SectionID=2&SubSectionID=52&ArticleID=6629

Sunday, November 14, 2010

T Minus 16 Days and Counting...

... until school board nomination papers can be taken out and circulated.


Seats up this year are David Stackhouse and Jill-Camber-Davidson
We've heard conflicting indications on whether either will be running for re-election.


Will this be an election like the recent mid-term elections?  Out with the old and in with the new?
We need interested candidates who are willing to become engaged.  
District administration has already told us to prepare for a double-digit tax levy increase next year.
Must that be the case?  Who we elect to the school board will make that call.


100 signatures is all it takes to get on the ballot.

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Budget Session: Which School Board Members Tried to Lower Your Taxes

Referendum Surplus:  (~ $80,000)
John Welke: Other than the money reserved for the greenhouse, we have about $80,000...couldn't that be applied against the debt levy?
Jim "Seabass" McCourt:  I say none [be applied to the debt levy].
John Whalen:  The feedback I got was, "we approved it so spend it all".
John Welke: I wouldn't restrict yourself to a figure of $80,000.  I'd say whatever the surplus is we apply it against the debt levy.  Suggested the board needed to decide whether or not to commit to the greenhouse.

School Board Salaries (Budget calls to re-instate the 5% cut made at the annual meeting last October)
John Welke:  We need to do some more whittling.  I think restoring board stipends would be a mistake; the community was clear.  We should freeze board salaries at 2008-09 levels.

Contracts vs. Budget (Board recently settled with Administrators for a 1% increase; 1% increase in health insurance premium co-pay; 2% increase in dental premium co-pay.  Amount budgeted has not been shared, but word is that the budget planned for a 2.5% increase and NO increases to health/dental premium co-pay.
John Welke: Some contracts have been settled at a savings over what was budgeted; where is that savings?
[Phil Frei:  We haven't made that adjustment yet]

Enrollment (Budget called for 133 new students).  We get about $6,000 in state aid for each new student.  But the accounting is based on a 3-year average, so "new" students count only 1/3.    
John Welke:  asked where we are at with enrollments and how that factors into the budget.
Phil Frei:  As of today the count is at +291 students, but we don't know yet how many won't show up.
Welke: Are there any proactive efforts we can take to identify those that might be leaving the district?

SP-EYE note:  if the number stands at 291, that means the state aid revenue increases by approximately $300-$325,000.  IF the new students do not require hiring any additional positions, the tax levy COULD be reduced by that amount.

$1.3M Surplus from 2009-10
John Welke:  When are we going to see where we saved the money?  Can we apply some of the surplus against the tax levy?
Jim McCourt:  Proposed using $500K of the surplus to apply against the tax levy and $200K for property tax chargebacks.
John Whalen:  "My thought as well...the message was loud and clear that people want something from fund balance".

Attendance at State School Board Conference (Budgeted amount ~ $4500)
Jim McCourt:  I would suggest we not attend the conference; cut $4500.
David Stackhouse: I disagree with taking the school board budget for the state conference out.
John Whalen:  I agree [with Stackhouse]

SP-EYE note:  Hmmm...maybe Stackhouse just liked the looks of those sea bass dinners that McCourt had.

Chamber of Commerce Membership (~$1300)
John Welke:  Any thoughts on that Tim [Culver]?
Culver:  The chamber is a little disappointed.  It's an opportunity to work with the business community.
Welke:  We can still work with them...we don't have to be a member...right?
Decision: Postpone for input from Terry Shimek, the Chamber liaison.

SP-EYE note:  What's the point?  Shimek will probably find a reason to abstain from any vote.

Early estimate of the 2011-12 budget picture
Caren Diedrich:  Phil, do you have an inkling of what the tax levy for 2011-12 might be?
Phil Frei: "It can't be good given the state budget picture".

Legal Representation at Expulsion Hearings
Caren Diedrich:  If we're still looking at reductions, we've had about 30 expulsion hearings in the past 2 years.  Do we really need to involve an attorney at those hearings?

National Travel Budget ($15,000)
John Welke:  $15K for national travel...what would that be for?
Phil Frei: 2 board members used to go to the national school board conference; the national Math conference.
Welke:  If we don't attend the state school board conference, is there really value in attending at the national level?  I'd be in favor of at least reducing the budget by the amount for board members.
John Whalen:  I'd rather set some $$ than no $$.
Jim McCourt: I don't want to see us fall beyond by not attending [and catching on to the latest information].

Substitute Teachers
Caren Diedrich:  Administration should give a little more scrutiny to when we need substitute teachers.  At the high school level...send them to study hall.

Staff Development [Budgeted $20,000]  Curriculum Development [Budgeted $10,000]
John Welke:  Is there any opportunity there [to reduce those budget items] without directly impacting students?

Building and Department budgets [restored 5% budget cut, costing ~ $200K]
John Welke:  How much of that $200K would go directly to teachers and their classrooms? [about 50%]
Welke:  Instead of restoring the full 5%, could we restore 2-3% [of non-school budgets]
Welke:  I'm nervous about restoring too much too fast.  What if property values [equalized value] drops by 1% instead of being flat as budgeted?

Purchasing
Jill Camber-Davidson:  Is there anything we can do with purchasing, for example buying at Office Depot [where we have a purchase contract discount] rather than Walmart?
....................................................
So...when push comes to shove...how did your duly elected representatives try to help you out? The tally:
John Welke: Identified 9 budget line items ripe for reduction (didn't get much support).
Caren Diedrich: Raised 3 budget areas that could be targeted for cuts...but most were pretty out there.
Jill Camber-Davidson: Not very vocal.  Only spoke about one area to make reductions.
Jim McCourt: Net Zero.  Wanted to make 2 cuts, but voiced opposition to 2 others.
Terry Shimek:  Net Zero...because he wasn't there.
David Stackhouse:  Minus 1. Not very vocal.  Did not support cutting school board budget to attend state conference....which we find intersting since, based on "policy", he wouldn't be eligible to attend.
John Whalen:  Net Minus 1.5.  Supported 1 reduction, opposed 2 others.  On a 3rd we gave him only half (negative credit) for wanting to spend "some".

All in all, not much was accomplished because no votes were taken.  It's really not clear what impact this session had on the budget.  The two things that were clear: (1) the tax levy will be reduced by $500K out of the $1.3M surplus, and (2) John Welke was the only board member targeting areas for budget reductions.  And all he spoke about were administrative areas that do not affect the education of our kids.

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Egg on Their Faces


At last Monday's school board meeting, Al Slane made a motion to return $50,000 which was cut from individual school budgets by paying for it out of the ginormous slush fund ($7.8M) known as "fund balance". Unfortunately, only he and Jill Camber-Davidson saw the wisdom in doing so. Slane's motion was defeated 2-5, with Whalen, McCourt, Shimek, Stackhouse and Diedrich voting against.

Stackhouse claimed, "The more money we take out of fund balance, that affects our credit rating and standing."

Come on, David! You're being disingenuous to say the least. That 50,000 represented 0.64% of the fund balance slush fund! THAT would do NOTHING to our credit rating. You also already agreed to take $200,000 out to repay a property tax charge-back and another $183,060 to pay for issuing the last $6M school bond. What's another $50K to give teachers what they need to do their jobs?

Phil Frei said, "Every year schools return unspent budgeted money." Sure...that's technically correct. But you and administration also strong arm teachers with warnings not to "spend it like you'll lose it if you don't". Gee...but that's exactly what happens!

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Slane & Camber-Davidson get Dunked for Scholarships

Kudos to school board members Al Slane and Jill Camber-Davidson for volunteering themselves for the Cannery Square Block Party Dunk Tank Scholarship Fundraiser held yesterday June 20th. Camber-Davidson actually volunteered for TWO shifts!

What makes both their volunteer efforts ext ra special is that both these board members also pledged to personally match any funds received during their time in the dunk tank? Now that's what we call community engagement. Putting yourself "out there" to the community. What a great way to work WITH the community towards a great goal: scholarships.

All board members were contacted and invited to volunteer for the dunk tank. We understand that board president John Whalen was out of town for another event. As for Diedrich, Shimek, and Stackhouse. Unknown.

Where was Mr. Community Engagement?
So...where was Jim McCourt, Mr. Community Engagement himself? Well, there were numerous reported sightings of McCourt lurking at the Block Party. So he was most certainly in attendance, but too big to volunteer for the dunk tank and such a good cause? We're betting a whole lot of scholarship money would have been earned if Mr. McCourt had stepped up.

Friday, March 13, 2009

...and Jim McCourt will have the Sea Bass (and NY Strip! and Shrimp!)

Ok... Sportsfans...this is what you've all been waiting for...

Ever since last year's annual WASB school board conference ( Reminisce over last year's feast!), when the Admin & School Board gang broke the bank at Butch's Old Casino Steakhouse, you've all been wondering...what would they do for an encore?



So...what did they do for an encore? How about a two-night extravaganza! Night One had the gang dining at the very haute cuisine "Umami Moto".

This is where Jim McCourt had the Sea Bass. Several communityt folks have wondered whether McCourt purposefully ate high on the hog (or fish) just as an "in your face" to SP-EYE and those community residents who believe that a "reasonable" meal is not defined as spending over $40 per plate. We'd like to believe that McCourt is not that shallow. He's just used to fine dining (and wining). What kind of community would we be to stick a pin in his balloon?

For Night Two the gang went back to Butch's Casino Steakhouse, the scene of last year's crime. Mr. McCourt had the 10 oz. NY Strip with 2 giant Guayma shrimp.

All told they spent $377.07 over two dinners (7 dined on the first night; 6 on the second) ...and that does NOT include any beverages!!!! Several board members were quick to point out that while they all had "a few adult beverages" (bar tab of $39.50 for Night Two), these were paid for separately. Thank heavens for small favors...right? It's not like these people are completely devoid of scruples.




Mr. McCourt won the prize for spending the most per meal EACH night, clocking in with a whopping 2-day dinner tab of $80.49!. Perhaps some will think we're being a tad unfair by singling out Mr. McCourt...but he WAS the one who argued so vehemently last year when last year's tab was questioned by the community. Mr. McCourt made his point loud and clear that there was a sense of entitlement to a couple of fine meals because he and other school board members give so much of their time to the district. Yep...and just when is Mr. McCourt going to take all those who volunteer countless hours reading to and tutoring kids out for a sea bass or filet mignon dinner??? There are MANY folks who give selflessly to the district and don't carry a sense of entitlement to anything. There's a difference.

Incumbent school board members John Whalen and Al Slane, both running for re-election, apparently had no loss of appetite worrying how the public would feel about them splurging on the taxpayer's dime for two consecutive nights.

On the other hand, we appreciate that both Jill Camber-Davidson and Terry Shimek (who also is up for re-election) chose to join in for only ONE of the evening fares. They also were not eating anywhere near as high on the hog as Jim McCourt. They spent less than the other board members except for Al Slane's very conservative $16 tab on Night One. He did make up for it, though, by doubling that total on the 2nd night.

A special award has to go to Caren Diedfrich who skipped the dinners entirely.









Saturday, March 22, 2008

School Board candidiates - Summary

Here is SP-EYE's perhaps overly simplified summary of the 5 candidates' perceived strengths and weaknesses. Summaries are offere here in ballot order. The election is April 1, 2008. Don't be a fool, VOTE!


JILL CAMBER-DAVIDSON
Positives:

  • Experience: served on Finance and now Education & Policy Committees

  • Fiscal awareness demonstrated during Finance committee tenure

  • Not a member of the Board-Admin "club"


Concerns:
  • Can appear shy and reserved.




AL SLANE
Positives:

  • Brings a fresh perspective

  • Engineering & technology skills a plus


Concerns:

  • A little too much of a Jim Carrel groupie

  • No committee experience; lacks knowledge of board operations



TERRY SHIMEK
Positives:

  • Familiarity with district operations

  • Financial knowledge


Concerns:

  • Professionalism a question mark. Seen on numerous occasions laughing AT fellow committee members' sincere comments

  • Interest in the board seems to come and go. Ran 3 years ago

  • Wife is a teacher...a potential conflict of interest?

  • Too familiar with the District Administration?

  • No response to League of Women Voters' candidate questionnaire




DAVID STACKHOUSE (I)

Positives:

  • Experienced (3 yrs)

  • Keeps a level head


Concerns:

  • Tends to pontificate at times

  • Have seen some vote reversals



MARY ELLEN HAVEL-LANG (I)


Positives:

  • The school board is her life

  • Experienced (12 yrs)

  • Charming... if you agree with her

  • Uses Roberts' Rules as her personal weapon


Concerns:

  • The school board is her life

  • Tone turns nasty...if you dont agree with her

  • Too cozy with administration

  • 12 years is too much; 15 years would be WAY too much